Mark Rzepczynski, Author at IASG

It will be a tough investment world going forward for the simple reason the odds are against you. If you are a blackjack card counter in Vegas, you always know the odds, or the count. You know that on any draw, you can get lucky, but in some environments, the chance of success is just lower. Regardless of how smart you are, if the odds are not with you, your chances of getting good returns are lower. Your job as an investor is to know the odds and deal with the consequences.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) Global Risk Report serves as a useful guide on the broader set of risks that may impact the world over the next year. This report is important because it moves outside the narrow focus of finance and looks at a broader set of risks. Nowhere are economic issues in the top five for impact or likelihood in 2017. This is a big change from the 2007-2010 period. This is the first time economic issues are neither in the likelihood or impact top five. The dominant category is environmental which suggests that commodities markets are most likely to have the immediate impact if there is a shock. Extreme weather and natural disasters have the highest impact and likelihood combination from WEF analysis

Managed futures, as measured by the SocGen index, finished negative for the year. Many would have thought this was an odd 12-month return performance given the events of the year. Let’s list some of the big moves: the large equity decline in the first quarter, the equity gains in the fourth quarter, the bond gains and subsequent fall through the year, the dollar move higher, the BREXIT event, the US presidential election, and the comeback in oil to name a few. We could go on with some of the minor markets, but the overall conclusion is that there were trends and there were some large moves.

The market euphoria since November is all based on expectations of future US policy. Rational expectations of future policy and not the current economy are driving markets. Albeit the US economy has positive sentiment and has shown economic growth improvement, there are still headwinds that may only be mitigated through a change in policies. 2017 will be defined by the implementation of those policies and their effectiveness at reducing the ongoing credit recession.

The euphoria of the US presidential election is over. The market jumped under a new wave of optimism associated with an end to fiscal austerity, tax cuts, and regulatory reform, but now the reality has to set in and investors have to see the actual policies and believe they will be effective. This new sense of reality may describe the current price action for asset classes. You can call it mean reversion or a response to an earlier over-reaction.

Our commentary for the new year is not filled with predictions but describes an uncertain world of extremes for 2017. This uncertainty exists because the rise of populism seen in 2016 will have to be converted into macro policies during 2017.

Hedge fund managers are supposed to show skill during periods of higher risk and uncertainty. If there is more uncertainty or ambiguity concerning market, skill-based managers should be able to do better than those who just buy a market index. This is one key reason behind choosing hedge funds. When there is uncertainty and risk, alpha should be generated by skill managers.

All systematic traders are not alike. Investors know that, but the differences become highlighted at the end of the year when returns are reviewed. There are potential diversification gains within a strategy space by choosing a set of managers who behave differently.

2016 became a great year for small cap, value, and growth indices post the US election. Investors are discounting changes in 2017 that will impact the bottom line for companies, so the new year will be about realizing those optimistic expectations. The recent declines versus short-term moving averages suggest that this euphoria is now being tempered.

Show me the performance for the year and I should be able to tell you something about the economic and political events for the year. I may not be able to tell you the specifics, but I should tell you whether it was a “good” or “bad” year in terms of economic growth, uncertainty, risk, and confidence. Looking back over 2016, you would not know that it was a year of political upheaval.

The one take-away from the Great Financial Crisis has been the importance of financial intermediation, banking. When banking is disrupted, lending will not happen. There will be a cutback in credit which stalls the economy. Additionally, if capital is not available for banking, there will be a cap on lending especially if there is a constraint on leverage. Funding will become scarce. If bank capital falls, lending will be disrupted. This lending channel is amplified with the swings in the business cycle.

The latest hedge fund asset flow report published by EVESTMENT tells a tale of an industry that has become more competitive and is in a period of consolidation. The easy money of being a hedge fund manager is over. Now, you have to earn your AUM through offering a better product. The year to date outflows for 2016 have been $83 billion which is small on a $3 trillion base, but suggests that investors are getting more particular in what they expect from hedge funds. Couple these outflows with the higher level of fund closing and we see a competitive market place which is unforgiving to managers. It does not matter whether you think you have investment skill; poor performance will relegate you to obscurity.