Archives

I came across in some old papers the Toyota Industries solution to finding the root cause of problems, the 5 whys. It is a simple and useful tool. Sakichi Toyoda, the father of Toyota Industries, developed this technique to solve manufacturing problems, but it could easily be applied to any investment problem or due diligence issue. Ask why five times.

There could be a desire to look for special patterns within April performance, but the only clear theme is the risk associated with holding bonds during a rising inflation expectation and tightening Fed environment. These issues spill-over to the dollar which affected affects the performance of international stocks.

Most hedge fund strategies were positive for April, but the average return was less than 50 bps. There were two negative outlier strategies with fundamental growth and merger arbitrage. Generally, the higher monthly volatility and dispersion created a mixed environment for return generation. Year to date returns suggest that it has been a difficult four months for most managers with average loses much larger than the average for the winners and only 7/19 strategies producing positive returns.

Our sector trend indicators, a combination of different trend length directions added across markets within a sector, show some significant changes from last month. This represents opportunities for May but also why some managers showed mixed performance for April.

Call it the revenge of the safe asset. Bonds, especially on the long-end, continue to see a sell-off on a surge in inflation and the continued view that the Fed will not change their rate hiking program. This decline has been coupled with generally weaker performance in equities which has led to higher correlation between equity and bonds. The correlation measurement, which is backward-looking, still is negative between stock and bonds but it has risen from previous lows. This increase reduces the “safety” effect associated with bond diversification which has been the “free lunch” for many investors. This will be a growing problem if it continues. Investors will have to make portfolio diversification changes.

What is the most fundamental lesson learned for investors from the Financial Crisis of 2008? It is simple and in the name. We don’t call 2008 the Great Recession. We call it the Financial Crisis. Financial conditions matter more than what we have thought in the past. If money and credit is the oil that runs the engine of commerce, then financial conditions measure the efficiency of the wiring.

…Choices in situations of extreme uncertainty, which I termed “ambiguity”: sparse information, unprecedented or unfamiliar circumstances, lack of reliable frameworks for understanding processes, conflicting evidence of testimony, or contradictory opinions of experts….I felt that existing theories of appropriate behavior (“rational choice”) in these circumstances were inadequate, in fact misleading… 

There is a host of alternative risk premiums that are available in the market; some have low returns and low volatility, some good returns but low information ratios, and others have had spotty returns that have moved between good and bad periods. Yet, there is a significant value with these strategies when they are blended together through total return swaps. The value is created through two key features, the low correlation across strategies and the executing through swaps which provides variable leverage.

Why are some investors risk takers and others are not? Is risk-taking something that can be taught or is it innate? Risk-taking – is it nature or nurture?

There has been a litany of stories on yield curve flatness as if this is the signal that will provide the investment secret to success for 2018. Investors should watch the yield curve closely, but it is important to focus on what it is and is not signaling. There is a cost with trying to be preemptive to what is being signaled in the yield curve.

This is the second in our series; all you need to know about a topic should fit on a “3 by 5” index card. We think the complexity of hedge fund investing can be simplified if the simple dichotomy of divergent and convergent trading is used as a primary method of describing potential return pay-offs.

Static investments in long-only commodity indices have had a checkered past since the financial crisis. With the end of the commodity super-cycle, there has been a long commodity unwind and passive investing in commodities has provided negative annualized returns for investors for years. There has not been any bounce to pre-crisis level like we seen in equities. The interest in commodities as an inflation hedge has waned with this poor performance.

There has been a consistent drumbeat that investors should use hedge funds as a core means of portfolio diversification. This has been at the expense of other methods of hedging. A diversification strategy makes sense when there is no investor information advantage or no view on the direction of markets, but in reality, investors often have some view on market direction or risks at the extreme. However, given the uncertainty on market direction and the inability to form conditional hedges, the investor focus is usually on strategy diversification through hedge funds.