Absolute return strategies aim to generate positive returns irrespective of market direction. A more accurate and appropriate definition is that absolute return, or active investment management, always seeks to minimize losses. We mentioned this as a core attribute of an absolute return strategy in “Why an Absolute Return Strategy,” but this simple concept is worth […]
As we discussed in “Why an Absolute Return Strategy”, most investors, knowingly or not, rely on long-only passive strategies. These investors may shift between stocks, bonds and cash at various intervals, but generally their portfolio returns mimic those of well-known stock and bond indices. Alternatively, active or absolute return investors rely on many different strategies that are not dependent upon a positive market direction to generate positive returns. To continually build wealth through good and bad markets, absolute return investors require a diverse, alternative set of strategic tools. This article describes a number of strategies used by absolute return investors to help them achieve their goals.
The first goal of investing is to increase wealth or, to put it differently, to increase purchasing power. Warren Buffet says, “Rule 1 of investing is never losing money. Rule number 2 is never forget rule number 1.” The hidden message in these seemingly obvious statements is that building wealth depends much more on preventing […]
It is time for another NFA Board of Directors election. If it seems like we just asked you for your
vote, it’s because we did as you elected us to two-year terms less than a year ago. However, due to
changes to the Board’s composition, we currently find ourselves up for election yet again in the only
two contested races on the whole Board. We know that the constant stream of elections may seem
unimportant, but as someone who makes their living subject to ever-increasing regulation, taking the
time to vote for effective Board representation directly benefits your business.
One of the unique things about NFA is that it is chartered as a democratic, Member-run self-regulatory
organization. This carries with it substantial responsibilities for both Members and Management to
balance maintaining the rights of Members with protecting customers and avoiding regulatory capture
whereby the organization could be run for the benefit of a select few. For the organization to be
successful, Members need to take an active role in its governance, by educating themselves on often
complex regulatory issues, speaking out on proposed regulations, and electing Directors who put those
goals above their own personal benefit. We think that we have done the latter to the best of our
abilities and would be honored to continue serving you on the Board.
Part 2 of our series on bonds “Bonds – Is Credit Growth Hitting its Limits?” discussed the likelihood that the demand to borrow could stay weak, keeping the demand curve from shifting right and therefore playing an important role in keeping a lid on higher interest rates. In this final article of the series we focus on factors that investors should consider to help gauge demand for bonds.
In “Bonds – More Than Meets the Eye”, we proposed that despite historically low interest rates there may be opportunities in Treasury Bonds to earn total returns well in excess of their current low yields. In this article, the second installment of a three part series, we analyze some important factors which help determine where interest rates might be headed in the near term. This article focuses on the demand side of the supply/demand curve to understand pricing pressures. Part 3 of this series will emphasize the supply side of the curve and key determinants of interest rates including economic growth and inflation.
When buying equities, some investors plan for a short holding period, seeking to capitalize on short-term price fluctuations – “a trade”. Others plan on a longer holding period based on economic or fundamental analysis – “a long-term strategic investment”. Regardless of which tactic is employed, few schedule a specific day, month or even year for divestiture. Contrast this with the bond investor’s strategy, whereby many bondholders seek to hold their investment to its maturity date. Those bond investors possessing this predilection are likely unaware of potential opportunities that trading bonds offers. In this era of historically low yields the opportunity for outsized returns may be significantly larger than current yields advertise if one considers selling a bond prior to its maturity.
The chart above plots the performance of the Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) index, a benchmark measuring the prices of 19 diverse commodities. The legend is purposefully omitted so that we may pose the following question: If the lines represent one indicator, why are there 3 lines? The answer lies not in the commodity prices underlying the index, but in the currency used to express the prices. The blue line represents the CRB index as it is commonly expressed, in U.S. dollars (USD). The green line is denominated in euros and the black line in Brazilian reals. This graph highlights that the currency in which a commodity is denominated can have a meaningful effect on prices.
Global growth for 2015 is projected at 3.1 percent, 0.3 percentage point lower than in 2014, and 0.2 percentage point below the forecasts in the July 2015 World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update. Prospects across the main countries and regions remain uneven. Relative to last year, the recovery in advanced economies is expected to pick up slightly, while activity in emerging market and developing economies is projected to slow for the fifth year in a row, primarily reflecting weaker prospects for some large emerging market economies and oil-exporting countries.
Historically, periods of USD appreciation have led to outflows of investment dollars resulting in economic hardship, crisis and even regime change in emerging market nations. The 1997-1998 Asian crisis, the related default of Russia and the collapse of the hedge fund Long Term Capital Management, for instance, were precipitated by a strong USD and a rapid reversal of capital flows from Asia back to the U.S. It is estimated the crisis resulted in the repatriation of $250-$500 billion.
Over the past year, the real trade-weighted U.S. dollar (USD) index increased over 10%, fostering a slowing of global economic growth, increased volatility in financial markets and plummeting commodity prices. This serves as a reminder of the influence the USD has on global trade and asset markets. Periods of dollar appreciation, as highlighted in the graph below, are not well understood by the investing public as there have been only two major appreciation periods since the removal of the gold standard in 1971. The potential consequences from a third major USD appreciation can have a significant effect on expected asset class returns.
For the past several months, IASG has been in the process of updating the aesthetics of our site. To do this properly, we conducted an IASG user questionnaire to get a better sense of what users liked, disliked, and wanted to see more of…For the most part, feedback was incredibly good. Users loved the functionality […]
The IASG CTA Index has approximately 75% of managers updated through July performance with almost all sectors posting positive returns for the month. The one exception is the agricultural index where many managers struggled with grain pricing continuing downward pricing and many with expectations that there would be a bounce back in grains.